← Back to Session 13
Section 4 — Your Voice 8 key phrases

Session 13 Key Phrases: Making an argument

Eight phrases for constructing and presenting arguments in English — from stating a position to summarizing it, with the connective tissue that makes reasoning sound both confident and rigorous.

My argument is...thesis statement opener
Use when: stating your central position clearly at the outset of a discussion or piece of writing
A direct, confident way to introduce a thesis. It signals that what follows is a reasoned position, not just an opinion, and that the speaker is prepared to defend it.

"My argument is that stricter regulation of social media platforms is not only justified but long overdue — and I'll explain the reasoning in three steps."

The evidence suggests...evidential claim phrase
Use when: introducing data, research, or facts to support a point — with appropriate epistemic caution
Presents evidence without overclaiming. "Suggests" acknowledges that evidence points toward a conclusion without guaranteeing it — honest and precise language for an uncertain world.

"The evidence suggests that early intervention programs reduce long-term costs significantly — though the long-term studies are still incomplete."

I would counter that...rebuttal opener
Use when: responding directly to an opposing argument with a substantive challenge
A formal phrase for introducing a rebuttal. "Counter" signals a direct intellectual challenge — more precise and more forceful than "but I think".

"You argue that the market will self-correct — I would counter that the historical record offers very little support for that assumption in situations like this one."

This point is undermined by...critical analysis phrase
Use when: identifying a weakness, contradiction, or piece of evidence that weakens the opposing case
Precise and analytical — it identifies a specific logical or evidential problem rather than simply disagreeing. "Undermined" suggests the foundation of the argument is weakened, not just challenged.

"This point is undermined by the data from 2019, which showed the opposite trend — which the report conspicuously fails to mention."

The strongest case for X is...steelmanning phrase
Use when: presenting the best version of an argument — either your own or the one you are about to rebut
Forces intellectual honesty by requiring the speaker to articulate the strongest, not the weakest, version of a position. Essential for credible argumentation — shows you understand what you are arguing against.

"The strongest case for keeping the policy unchanged is the risk of unintended consequences — that is a serious concern and one I want to address directly."

There is a counterargument here.anticipatory concession phrase
Use when: proactively acknowledging an objection to your own position before it is raised
Strengthens an argument by showing the speaker has already considered the opposing view. Anticipating objections is a sign of rigorous thinking — and it prevents opponents from using them against you.

"There is a counterargument here — that increased regulation stifles innovation — and it is one I take seriously. But I think the risks of under-regulation are greater."

I accept that point, but...concession-and-contrast phrase
Use when: acknowledging a valid point on the other side before redirecting to your own position
The grammar of intellectual honesty in argument. Accepting a point does not mean abandoning your position — it means you are engaging with the strongest version of the other side before explaining why your view still holds.

"I accept that point — the short-term costs are real and significant. But the long-term consequences of inaction are, in my view, considerably greater."

To sum up my position...concluding summary phrase
Use when: bringing a discussion or argument to a close by restating the core claim and its key support
Signals a conclusion and invites the listener to evaluate the argument as a whole. A clear summary phrase helps the audience follow the argument's structure and remember the central point.

"To sum up my position: the evidence supports intervention, the counterarguments have been addressed, and the cost of inaction is higher than the cost of acting. That is why I am in favor."